Thu 9 Sep, 2010
In the above photo, the stand in the foreground seems like just the ticket for Firefly. I believe these machines are by the legendary Mr. Wilkins. They appear to reflect the design seen on Trajan’s column, shown in the photo below.
My apologies for not providing credit to the persons responsible for the above photos. They are something I acquired from somewhere, and have no idea where (will correct as soon as I find out). Update: thanks to Martin and Randi for their attached comments that straighten out the authorship of these photos. Glad somebody can keep this old metal-pounder in line.
It is interesting that the Trajan’s column depiction does not show the limbs of the ballista. With an outswinger they should be clearly visible; while an inswinger, at full cock and at this oblique angle, the limbs would be pretty well hidden by the field frames and stock. Because of this, it seems like a simpler and more direct argument to say that this ancient depiction is of an inswinger rather than an outswinger. To make the case for an outswinger from this artwork, we would have to make explanations about the missing limbs based on some kind of artistic license. To my simple machinist’s mind, that is just the kind of needless complexity for which Mr. Occam dishes out his razor sharp spankings.
Also, we note that the long groove shown on the side of the stock may indicate the presence of a static rail system for the catch assembly to ride on. Perhaps Firefly is on the right track here after all.