Tue 21 Jul, 2015
Back in the day (20 odd years ago) I gained a bit of experience shooting different types of bolts out of this old fellow. It was my first machine and I called it the “Gallwey” .
The bolt seen here does not project through the opening in the box frame. Shorter bolts like this can tend to make the shooter a tad squeamish when it comes time to pull the firing lanyard. A machine with unbalanced thrust in the spring bundles could easily cause a short bolt to jump it’s groove. If it hit one of the stanchions in the box frame, parts of a shattered bolt might bounce back in surprising and unpleasant ways. It’s all great fun ….. until somebody puts out an eye……
And so, we might coclude that conventional outswingers, of the type seen above, are not ideal for use with shorter bolts. Now why would the Romans be interested in shooting shorter bolts like this? Or, for that matter, really short bolts, perhaps half the length of the one seen here? (Ref: Dura Europos bolt dimensions, archives, Dec 2008) If you are trying to develop a precision sniping weapon, short bolts have many advantages. With a properly designed short bolt (i.e. not a long javelin type, something maybe 18 to 36 inches long) you get the following: higher velocity, flatter trajectory, better aerodynamics, greater range, better penetration due to the reduced cross section, and because it is so stiff relative to it’s length, the issues of spine that can beset longer projectiles, are virtually eliminated.* On this latter, I have many times witnessed the kind of oscillation than can occur in a long and under-spined ballista bolt/javelin. Unless they are of large enough diameter (and therefore, unduly heavy) longer style shafts tend to buckle under all that power and get a case of the wobblies. Very underwhelming indeed.
So, all in all, my experience suggests that a relatively short bolt, of appropriate mass, is a better projectile for making picked shots. As a work of experimental archaeology, Firefly is purpose built to explore Roman sniping capabilities. In that role, flat trajectory* may not be everything, but it’s pretty close in my book.
Which brings us to the virtues of inswingers. I have done extensive shooting with both outswingers and inswingers for a couple of decades now, at power levels guaranteed to put a sizable dent in my noggin if something goes wrong. I can only say it feels a lot safer using an inswinger when one is shooting short bolts. There are no stanchions for a misfired bolt to crash into. Knowing any unpleasantness will be cast harmlessly out the front of an inswinger, does wonders for reducing that pesky old flinch factor that can disturb accurate shooting.
* And let’s not forget, with short bolts the storage and transport of ammunition is more efficient. Short bolts would probably be less expensive to produce given the smaller amount of material they use in the shaft and head. Also, there is less chance of the shafts warping. Short bolts would be harder to see in flight and, therefore, less easy to dodge. Short bolts rule says the quartermaster.
* “Flat trajectory” is a relative term. We are not talking about rifle ballistics here. After all, Firefly is really just an overgrown crossbow, not a 30’06.