Well here’s a guy who’s obviously pleased with himself. Click for Vid., 20110203114847
From Marsden’s treatise, “Greek and Roman Artillery” , we copy the following translation from the ancient Latin regarding the “Lightning” arrow firer. This description from the fourth century is by that renowned scholar Mr. “Anonymous”. (Curious how he keeps popping up through out all recorded history.) Anyway, here is what he has to say about an original machine that he had apparently witnessed in operation:
“It has been discovered by practical experience that this type of ballista, essential for the defense of fortifications, is superior to any others in velocity and power. When an iron arch has been fitted above the stock, along which the arrow is projected, a powerful sinew rope is drawn back by means of an iron hook and, when released, it propels the arrow with tremendous force at the enemy. The size of the actual machine does not allow this rope to be pulled back by the manual exertion of the soldiers; but two men, one to each of two wheels, draw the rope to the rear by pressing against the spokes in a rearward direction, since mechanical force has been obtained to match the enormity of the task. A roller- device now elevates and now depresses the machine, as may be necessary, in order to direct its missiles higher or lower. This remarkably clever demonstration, a combination of so many different components, is directed by the control of one man only at his leisure, so to speak — control confined simply to loading the missile ready for projection; this is apparently to avoid the consequence that if a crowd of fellows was engaged in manning it, the ingenuity of the device would be reduced. A missile projected from this engine, comprising so many important and clever devices, travels so much further that it has even the momentum to fly across the width of the Danube, a river noted for its size; it is called the Lightning ballista and, by its name, gives evidence of the effect of its powers.”
There are some interesting parallels between Firefly and the Lightning ballista as described by “Anonymous”. The Fourth Century AD when this passage was written and the location mentioned along the Danube are both consistent with the Orsova find that Firefly is based upon. Likewise, the potential for one man to aim and fire a machine like this is clearly demonstrated in the video at the beginning of this post. The “roller-device” that Anonymous describes to elevate and depress the machine is particularly interesting at this point in our project as I am about to complete the counterstay and prop upon which any elevation adjusting mechanism would likely bear. In his footnotes, Marsden comments that he took this “roller-device” to be the universal joint seen on the top of the stand, but this hardly seems compelling given that the universal joint had been in use on these types of machine for more than 700 years prior to this description, and would hardly provoke comment as something new and ingenious by the time the fourth century rolled around. Also, the exact wording of “now elevates and now depresses” would seem to indicate that the “roller-device” causes the machine to elevate or depress, and not merely allow those functions to occur as is the case with a universal joint. Now clearly these are all nit-picky little points, and whatever it was that Mr. “A” had in mind could easily be lost in translation; all that aside, there is another factor that my own experience with these machines suggests is vital for accurate shooting.
We first need to understand that there are two basic styles of aiming and firing a machine like this. They are: (1) shooting in an unsupported offhand manner as shown in the preceding video, and (2) shooting with a rest in a more deliberate and precise manner such as a sniper might use. In this latter role, the prop and counterstay are used to form a solid rest while aiming and firing. With the prop in place, side to side adjustments are easily accomplished by slewing the machine right or left because the prop has wide latitude to move in those directions. Aiming the machine up or down is a bit more problematic. Gross adjustments can be made by sliding the prop up or down the angled counterstay, but for the final hair splitting refinements this is hardly ideal. Typically I have used wedges to slip in and out to make the precise vertical adjustments, and that system can work quite well once you get used to it. However, it would be much smoother and faster to simply rotate an eccentric roller and have the machine elevate or depress a few fractions of a degree. I believe that the importance of such a “roller-device” cannot be underestimated once you actually get down to trying to make those impossible shots.
Perhaps I’d better put my current design for the prop and counterstay on hold, and see what can be done to incorporate an eccentric roller controlled by a hand lever of some kind.
It seems like it’s time to break out my very special thinking cap and have a little vino to help lubricate the process.
